Before I left for south-east Asia I watched the first part
of Ayn Rand’s ‘Atlas Shrugged’. I wanted to know how the story ended so I started
reading the 1,500 page novel. As a business student I found much of the work’s objectivist
philosophy to be of merit. The plot deals with how corrupt government officials
and their allies can appropriate entrepreneurial gains for their own interests.
It shows how this can retard a nation’s growth and even bring it to its knees.
Many commodities and
state assets have been subject to government manipulation. In a country where some cannot afford the
costs of subsistence, gas costs much more than in the U.S. Many museums charge above market rates for all
patrons because they are now controled by the governing family, which has amassed
billions of dollars.
Wealth is not a bad thing. However, from the discussions I
had, it seemed to me that if one has enough success the regime will make
matters difficult for that person’s business in the name of the public good.
My final day in Cambodia was Election Day. My hotel owner
did not bother to vote. “Even if we managed to elect the opposition those in
power would just throw the results out” he said. In this light, the power of Rand’s message
seems clear. There can be no path forward until business can be perused on
individual merit -- and until its rewards can be enjoyed by those who deserve
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment